Conversation

If you had a load of land and the opportunity to create a new city with it, who would you give votes to? Land owners = shareholders Tax payers = paying customers Residents = users Should it be any different than a corporation? Users can vote with their feet. LO/SH hold the bag.
Image
28
8
54
What ever happened to that? I get that throwing an income tax on everybody complicates the representation situation but couldn't that have been avoided by just jacking up the tax on land owners and letting them pass it along? Hard to see how letting the users run the biz works.
3
5
Playing Devil’s advocate. Conventional wisdom among many progressives is as follows: Residents are systematically oppressed by land owners and business owners. Taxing them and providing residents with benefits/services is the moral way to ensure a fair society.
1
1
This assumes that land owners have a monopoly or people are locked in to their residence and can't shop around for a better fit (product, service, price, terms, etc). Isn't the whole argument blown up just by offering every person a one-way bus ticket to wherever they'd prefer?
1
2
Society is designed around high switching costs. A person with a mortgage, student loans, credit card debt, and kids in school cannot easily move, change careers, etc. Exiting a marriage is difficult. This encourages stability, but reduces citizens ability to shop around.
2
2
Replying to and
I would love to see more innovation and competition at the state and municipal level. Maybe someday... In the short term, I support school choice. Allowing parents to choose where their kids go to school would revolutionize real estate and improve education for millions of kids.
1
3
💯 would love to see school choice. Would be game changing on a number of levels. One other hitch to resolve would be to what extent the schools can set their own curriculum and standards.
2
Show replies