Conversation

Why don't we pay politicians more? Governor of California makes $173k/yr to lead a team of 800k (like Amazon), which generates revenue of $140b/yr (like Google). If we want top talent, shouldn't the CEO of CA get paid something comparable to the CEOs of these businesses?
203
48
489
You could pay them a billion a year and it wouldn't change the fact that there's no profit motive and that they exist to rent-seek off of productive people. Also, they seem to manage to make themselves ultra-wealthy shortly after leaving office.
1
57
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
KPIs are subjective and differ for different people. For me, efficiently run services with as low taxes as possible. Others might want more spending depending on whether they are a recipient or bidding for contracts. Who cares about revenue? They can print that shit.
1
4
States can't really print. Getting a good deal makes sense as a KPI... low price, good service. There'd be a bunch of things that go on it that, different for each person, as you say.
4
Replying to and
Revenue cannot be KPI because that means the ultimate success is communism collecting 100% of all revenues in the state. Gross State Product could be but can be falsified. Inverse revenue combined with crime rate and migration flow maybe.
2
Replying to and
In this case Revenue as a kpi implies increasing taxes .. which decreases disponible income .. which decreases consumption .. which put corporates in a position to deleverage .. thus creating a negative feedback loop. What’s the balance? Laffer curve explains that.
1
A big lever (budget item) in US is defense spending, also unique versus other countries as a % of gdp. If that spend can be distributed (shared) with other countries, that freed up money can be used in US for healthcare, infrastructure, education, socia security.