Conversation

There is a reason there are circuit breakers in traditional markets. They work. Also, flash loans are a terrible idea. Financial systems need time to settle. Instant txn's involving millions of dollars is dumb. Human oversight is important to prevent systemic failures.
1
2
I don't understand the question.... My point is that circuit breakers add stability to a (leveraged) system, allowing cooler heads to prevail. A downward liquidation spiral to zero helps no one. Who gives a shit if your new financial system is "decentralized" if it's fragile?
1
2
Leverage is dangerous without any checks. If crypto was unlevered? Fine. Let the market work. But we now have crazy 100/1 levered futures. This creates systemic fragility. Either incorporate circuit breakers or get rid of the leverage.
1
2
That’s the lender’s problem. If the exchange is the lender, and massively over exposed/naked, circuit breakers or “maintenance” or whatever to buy time for the market will turn around before you have to bankrupt yourself and all clients makes sense but it’s not without losers.
2
1
No, it’s not just the lenders problem. Everyone holding BTC and ETH got their shit kicked in today because of leveraged lenders. There is collateral damage. Let’s stop pretending there aren’t consequences to the way we design these systems.
1