Conversation

There is a reason there are circuit breakers in traditional markets. They work. Also, flash loans are a terrible idea. Financial systems need time to settle. Instant txn's involving millions of dollars is dumb. Human oversight is important to prevent systemic failures.
1
2
I don't understand the question.... My point is that circuit breakers add stability to a (leveraged) system, allowing cooler heads to prevail. A downward liquidation spiral to zero helps no one. Who gives a shit if your new financial system is "decentralized" if it's fragile?
1
2
Leverage is dangerous without any checks. If crypto was unlevered? Fine. Let the market work. But we now have crazy 100/1 levered futures. This creates systemic fragility. Either incorporate circuit breakers or get rid of the leverage.
1
2
Absolutely. I find it kind of ironic that BTC was born out of the financial crisis, and the leveraged system that enabled it’s collapse. And yet we find ourselves making the same mistake of introducing leverage induced fragility into the system meant to replace the old one.
1
You can't lend more than you have. If we're talking about derivatives, the sky's the limit, as market blowups have proven over and over. It's not the problem of exchanges but of people getting over exposed and then scrambling to cover on smaller, hard asset, index constituents.