Conversation

I love you guys but you're wrong on this one. Confidentiality agreements are not a first amendment issue. We're in a high risk industry and it's a condition of the job. The issue here is someone accepted a cash payment or job in exchange for silence, and they weren't silent.
4
7
This is nonsensical. The agreement only restricted disparaging statements, which the lawsuit fails to identify. It's their burden to at least establish they have *something* before unmasking.
1
Replying to and
You tell me. The suit doesn't seem to get particularly specific, and the original review is already pretty vague. I don't see how it can violate any kind of sensible agreement. Is there a missing filing or something that fills in the gap?
1