Conversation

You think if a prop firm going down on kraken caused all btcusd margin longs to get liquidated there, while a few arb firms profited, that the exchange would be not responsible?
1
12
The exchange is not responsible for the price whatsoever. The exchange's responsibility is to match orders. The "price" (bid, ask, last trade, whatever) is set by the market participants, not the exchange. So, if the tech is working properly, the exchange is never responsible.
1
1
12
Noted. So if the price of btcusd went from $10k to $1 and back to $10k on btcusd on kraken while nowhere else moved, you'd consider that the forces of the free market and that margin longs on kraken should have done more due diligence, yes?
2
1
21
We are getting words confused here I think. I'm not arguing they should be legally liable. I'm saying if this were to occur on an exchange, it clearly means that exchange is unfit to have margin trading.
1
20
So you're arguing for circuit breakers or limitations on order management to prevent a price from moving despite intent of the market participants? How do you know when your market is out of sync vs leading? How long do you wait to find out and who gets blamed when you're wrong?
3
8
Max order size, max percent limit away from mid, enter auction mode (allows arbers time to prepare capital to arbitrage the flow). Many such concepts can be taken from trad mkts (esp FX, equities) I agree there are always tradeoffs and new problems would then arise potentially
3
21
Yeah, ultimately the answer is more liquidity with time. In some cases people are glad you liquidated them instantly, in others mad that you didn't wait longer. Someone will always end up holding the bag. It's very hard with 24/7 continuous, loosely connected global markets.
1
1
8
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies