I think the word "fault" here isn't really a useful one, I agree.
Main question is do underlying spot exchanges that are often used as oracles have any real or perceived esponsibility to the community to prevent this behavior?
Conversation
The answer is no
2
7
Depends on the circumstances. If there was an actual malfunction, yes. But if the markets are just inefficient because some large prop firm randomly shut down, and you think there’s such a sweet arb opportunity lying around, why complain to kraken? Go ahead and take it
2
11
That said, an exchange has responsibilities toward its own customers, so it would be in their best interest to sort things out somehow if they want to keep the margin product alive.
They have zero responsibility to keep bitmex plebs happy though
1
4
Anyone is welcome to offer any exchange incentives to adjust operating procedures/performance. If they're not compensated, there is no responsibility/obligation. I think this is a bit like asking your ISP to filter all the large packets because you want to use a short password.
1
1
3
Right. We would be more concerned with our own markets, our own clients, our own capital. Not incentivized to care about competitors. Whether spot exchanges offering margin or lenders of any sort should have different liquidation/risk mitigation procedures is another question.
1
1
6
Yes. If not better index methodologies then different liquidation rules, or both. You could use a single exchange's price but only trigger liquidations after X time (though the delay is also risky since the move could be global). Have to design contracts to sustain attacks.



