Twitter CEO Asks What Should be Done with Account in Private Message #bitcoin coinspice.io/news/bitcoin-c
28
62
140
Conversation
Hey , your ethical stances were praised last week. Care to offer your two cents on the banning of free speech?
4
1
14
Sure. I think we, as a community, have shown that we will not tolerate bullies abusing the legal system as a means of shutting down dissenting opinions. Harassing and stealing from those who disagree with you is effectively a ban on free speech. Crypto is about open discourse.
4
10
75
Don't you think Craig Wright has been harassed by these people?
1
Plenty of people have harassed CSW but AFAIK nobody has attempted to universally block CSW from making his claims or stating his opinions by way of force/abuse of the legal system. Harassment/trolling is universal online. You need thick skin if you are going to make great claims.
3
8
Also, your removal of BSV has literally only harmed your customers who were users and owners of BSV. That includes me and many others. Only for im tied to your website through your MtGox dealings I would be closing my account for the childish way in which its behaved
1
If the BSV community cared about maintaining exchange listings, it would have stepped up to denounce the lawsuit filed against Kraken, and lawsuits against our investors, business partners and clients. Unfortunately, the association with BSV has been net negative for our business
2
7
So tell me what was the point of polling twitter? A poll of people which are not limited to your users. You knew what the poll result would be. Anyway, I wasn't aware of a lawsuit against Kraken specifically. Im still not sure how causing your customers issues helps
1
The point was to give the community an opportunity to change our minds. The intent isn't to cause clients issues but we said from the start that BSV didn't meet listing requirements, and the business case for supporting it kept getting worse from there. theblockcrypto.com/2019/04/20/bit
You knew what community was voting on this, the larger BTC community, hundreds of times larger than the BSV community at this moment in time. It was never going to be anything but what it was.
And as regards the court case, from what I can tell ye did conspire with other exchanges to insitute checkpoints to secure the outcome of the upgrading/forking of the BCH blockchain at the time. I dont know about the legality of it. Had the hashwar (1/2)
2
(2/2) been restricted to those who were consistently providing hash to secure the chain then it would have been a very different outcome. The transfer of hash from BTC in order to swing it was certainly not in keeping with the "morals" or norms of crypto
so "from the start" it didnt meet your listing requirements...so you listed it just to be greedy and unethical?
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies