Conversation

Thank you for the suggestion. Here's a story idea for you: reporter does some investigative journalism and actually checks out a story, gets critical details important to readers, left out of original adapted PR fluff piece.
1
4
Thanks for that. I’m no expert on insurance but from speaking to people, the absence of significant claims history means the insurance industry can’t give you straight answers to those questions
1
But the insured certainly can, right? They're marketing this product which they paid for so they must be able to get specific.
2
Kraken doesn't have any insurance on crypto. So, we'd have to cover losses from the balance sheet (basically, self-insurance). I'm very skeptical of the value of 3rd party insurance anyone claims to have because in our investigation, they don't protect against real crypto threats
1
3
Thanks Ian. - we can set up a mutual if you and a few other exchanges wish to do so. Terms of cover can be agreed by members. It's better than self-insuring and you have more control (and better terms) than insurers can currently provide.
1
1
1
This would not be possible among peers in this industry due to the depth of audits that would need to be done by competitors, the amount of confidential/trade secret information that'd have to be revealed, the huge variance in investment in security and extreme risk.
1
1
These sort of problems have been overcome before, eg with independent experts, but it isn't easy, I acknowledge that. Consumers would benefit immensely from genuine protection, in my mind it's worth trying.
1
1