Another story on ShapeShift—and remember, this is really more about the exchange than analytics firm CipherBlade. Gerard has some great "outtakes" in here and a good summary on why all this is important.
Conversation
I read it but what’s the takeaway supposed to be? I didn’t see anything refuting the report.
3
2
"Outtakes," meaning items that didn't make it into the DeCrypt story. Takeaway is this: "The real story here is ShapeShift trying to protect its image. It’s odd that they didn’t hire a better-known blockchain analytics firm—or, at the very least, pay CipherBlade for their work."
1
2
Replying to
Thanks for explaining. Seems natural that a wrongfully disparaged company would want to protect its image. That CipherBlade didn't get paid, IMO, makes the report more valuable. It's an expertise/marketing display for a startup firm. We should judge the content, not the author.