You had me until the open source comment. True, open source means more eyes on your product and inevitably some of those eyes will be malicious, but security through obscurity leads nowhere good. Open source, audited software and designs are the way to go.
-
-
-
The ideal is security + obscurity. See what happened to the Death Star when it made a public call for design review. More on this topic:https://danielmiessler.com/study/security-by-obscurity/#goodbad …
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
DEXs are evolving. Even newer platforms (albeit not fully decentralised) and KISS rule contracts are incorporating a layer for familiar hardware (LedgerS/Trevor/etc) control from which users initiate trades. And I’m down for exploits being identified sooner as was the case in btc
-
Sure way to help exploits be identified sooner is to keep your BTC in there so the bug bounty is enticing enough to claim.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Please stop charging withdrawal fees.
-
We charge withdrawal fees because the network/bank charges fees. If we didn’t pass on the fee, hostile users could tax the exchange by making many withdrawals. A fee is the simplest form of spam control.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
You don't see many CEOs willing to speak about the dangers of their product. This is one of the reasons I love crypto.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
More proof that Kraken and Jesse are the good guys in crypto.
-
Like you! :)
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
