Proponents of C must admit that it is their worldview that it is acceptable to use physical force or the threat thereof to take money from one person, business, group, race, class, city, county, state, country, and give it to another. Where I come from, this is called stealing.1/
Conversation
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
The vote for C is to expand the role of the police force to extract funds from businesses. Those leaders who do not voluntarily hand over the funds will be imprisoned. Those who refuse to be imprisoned will be killed. Isn't that clear? Or, you could just ask for donations.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
People can certainly gang up and vote for whatever terrible, discriminatory policies they want. I only warn of the consequences. Appearing to be hostile to business might mean a huge divestment in SF as companies relocate, leaving SF short on tax revenue.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
I agree that no changes is only going to lead to a worsening situation. Here's an alternative: buy a plot of land somewhere, bus anybody camping in the city out to it, install border guards, blacklist offenders, set up enough temp beds to handle temp unemployment.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Or, drop them off wherever you want. Nobody is forcing them to stay on the plot of land provided to them. Just happens to not be in the city and since they were breaking the law, they won't be allowed back in the city without applying for a permit/visa.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
It's not about having a home. It's about breaking the law. If they break the law somewhere else, they won't risk being imprisoned in or relocated & blacklisted from SF. Why can't we just enforce the laws already there? Why stop at SF city, why not home everybody in the Marina?
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Since when is housing a human right? Who do you propose pays for everybody to be housed? Is food a human right too? What about running water? Electricity? 1906 was a special case, and I'm not saying no housing, ever. I'm saying, for a limited time, only in special cases.
1