A follow-up to my earlier tweet about crack-zombie assaults on SF employees, with my thoughts on Prop C, how remote work will force cities to become more competitive in attracting good residents and businesses.
Conversation
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
If there is something specific that you'd like to debate, I'm game but so far, I have only heard bigoted and presumptuous remarks, ad hominems, straw men and false dichotomies.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
I'm not debating any crack-zombies, afaik.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Money is just a tool. It can be used to finance good plans, which make things better, and it can be used to finance bad plans, which make things worse. I don't know if "crack-zombies" are part of the homeless population or not. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is immoral, not virtuous.
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Proponents of C must admit that it is their worldview that it is acceptable to use physical force or the threat thereof to take money from one person, business, group, race, class, city, county, state, country, and give it to another. Where I come from, this is called stealing.1/
3
I think you see business leaders objecting to C because we are used to being accountable for our spending. We should have a backup plan, pivots identified, benchmarks, milestones. How will we change our approach if our thesis turns out to be wrong and make things worse?2/
2
It is not at all clear to me that the way this money is intended to be spent is going to generate the ROI proponents are expecting. I think there are better options but because SF is highly susceptible to populism and demagoguery, an honest debate about tough choices is hard 3/3
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
So, why not 100x the tax and take in everyone? We are spending too much treating symptoms rather than causes, and we are not optimizing on the process/outcome. Much of what is proposed could be outsourced and handled better/cheaper outside of SF.
1