Conversation

Replying to
We need a Yelp for news -- a way of rating pieces and authors. Maybe reviewers are limited to subject matter experts. Does this exist? How shall we publicly shame the #shitscoopers and also give the public some guidance on what's real?
20
4
91
Replying to
Most these people ‘reporting’ have little to no understanding of what makes crypto valuable .. they just use buzzwords and spew bullshit they heard from other people who don’t know shit
Replying to
We in the feral cat crypto community couldn't agree more sir, that's why we have turned to Crypto Herpes Cat for all our crypto news. Probably going to cover the machinations of Fcoin after their recent FT burn next.
Quote Tweet
Since there's been a lot of talk and people finally realizing what we knew 5 months ago, here's an update on Bitmain, BCH, the IPO & What it All Means. medium.com/@btcWolves/a-b
6
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
a) then why cover it? b) twitter, reddit, company contact page? People might be reluctant to take interviews because (from personal experience) reporters are often accusatory, looking for a sensational angle, haven't done homework.
1
1
16
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Replying to
My aim is to encourage journalists to include as much source info as possible for their claims, and be transparent about updates / corrections. I personally rarely read anything that doesn't do this. Would appreciate any feedback you might have on this:
Quote Tweet
"Revision-Controlled #Journalism" - a new document updating & expanding on what I started researching in 2016: zelgaengerinmotte.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/revisi
Image
5
14