jeremy scahillVerified account

@jeremyscahill it's exactly what you'd expect with different sources

@jeremyscahill I think this is what raises the most questions

@jeremyscahill So... if a foreign leader 'discredits' a US pres candidate... we should accuse them of altering the election? Insane.

@jeremyscahill the guys who actually listen in on the signals aren't as confident as the guys who work only stateside; FBI.

@jeremyscahill the guys who actually listen in on the signals aren't as confident as the guys who overhear things from a third party; CIA.

@jeremyscahill NSA moderate confidence, not any proof? Please. I'm not an extra in your B film 'cause I've seen that movie too."

@jeremyscahill discredit Clinton...by letting public know how she / DNC really operate_based on their own words?

@jeremyscahill They're doing a fine job of discrediting themselves. Grab some popcorn and take a seat.

@jeremyscahill ikr If any acronym has the goods it should be that one... I guess they don't

@jeremyscahill Yeah they don't want to listen to the computer nerds when it comes to hacking.

@jeremyscahill most things should be done in moderation, confidence in intelligence reports should not be one of them

@jeremyscahill Since evidence comes from TV & Twitter-surely her campaign also criticised Putin therefore tit for tat?

@jeremyscahill Also they act as if "aspire" is a crime. When did 'aspiring' for something you want become a bad thing lol.

@jeremyscahill All of this is a dem paltry ruse to delegitimize legitimate NEWS!