jeremy scahillVerified account

@jeremyscahill @ggreenwald Serious question: Do we ignore all intel from community unless they hand over evidence? Will not usually happen

@cdsmith80 @jeremyscahill @ggreenwald Wide gap between ignoring and accepting as valid without substantiation, & this fails even smell test.

@fanoonman @jeremyscahill @ggreenwald I don't know. My disagreement comes from 2 independent investigations coming to same conclusion.

@cdsmith80 @jeremyscahill @ggreenwald (2) Also not credible that they "knew" by 10/7 Russia did it, but didn't "know" why until now. Really?

@fanoonman @jeremyscahill @ggreenwald Where are you getting that?

@cdsmith80 @jeremyscahill @ggreenwald "Joint statement" on 10/7, + US MSM quoting "seriior" sources on latest CIA briefing of some senators.

@fanoonman @jeremyscahill @ggreenwald I'm missing where anyone said they didn't know why. More likely were not prepared to say that yet

@transylvanianco @jeremyscahill "None of this new data constitutes a smoking gun that can clearly frame Russia as the culprit" #FactsMatter

@blackRussophile @jeremyscahill when viewed on context, it does.

@transylvanianco @blackRussophile @jeremyscahill In context of what? A boatload of anti-Russia preconceptions, + HRC losing the election?

@fanoonman @blackRussophile @jeremyscahill trump appointments, WL only releasing info helping putin, support for anti EU and far right in EU

@transylvanianco @blackRussophile @jeremyscahill (3) "Support 4 anti EU & far right in EU" by Russia? Unproven in itself, & not relevant.