To get more housing we need urbanists & constitutional lawyers to get together & file a lot of lawsuits. That’s the case I make in this post. Here’s a summary thread about it. In short, urbanists & libertarian/conservative lawyers need to talk. & sue. 1/https://ij.org/sc_blog/lets-take-zoning-to-court/ …
I'm interested to learn about legal challenges to exclusionary zoning. My read of Mt Laurel & Ch 40B is that neither have resulted in fundamental zoning reform or alleviating high housing costs, while creating more hostility btwn local & state govts. Open to other models, though.
-
-
I think the long-term outcome of MT was as you say. My hope is that with the bit of heightened scrutiny available under state constitutions some extreme elements of zoning could be pushed back. Here's an example regarding cosanguinity laws from Ohio. https://ohioconstitution.org/federal-court-victory-forbidding-more-than-three-people-from-living-together-violates-ohio-constitution/ …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.