Question for the hivemind: how broadly can we realistically define "ideology" as a motive for terrorism under Canadian law? The more I'm reading about these incel assholes, the more I feel like they meet the threshold. But ... is there a reasonably well-defined threshold at all?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @mattgurney
With the caveat that we still don't know a lot, this would meet the definition IMO.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @mattgurney
There is, it's just nuanced. You need to show motivation and that is not easy to do hours after an attack.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jengerson
I don't think the problem is defining motivation. It's defining ideology.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @mattgurney
I have no problem ascribing to incel culture an extreme and organized worldview. Killing to put Staceys in their place fits terrorism to me.
7:19 AM - 25 Apr 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.