Existing law gives the Energy Dept authority to set aside up to 1 billion barrels of oil for emergencies without dictating where they should go. Under this plan, the U.S. would essentially buy oil locked underground but ask producers to hold off on extracting or delivering it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Congress already rebuffed a more modest plan to spend $3B buying oil for the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve & this idea could be even tougher to sell. But ideas are flying fast, and it wasn't long ago that folks were scoffing at boasts of a potential 10mbpd production cut.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sounds like socialism. And the
@GOP is ok with this!?! Narrator: Of course they are. -
Republican isn't a thing anymore, just Trumpism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Guess it’s time to welcome them to the
#KeepItInTheGround movement? ;) -
For a while. Once prices rise above $50/barrel interests will diverge again but enjoy the bedfellows while you have them
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hmm. Won’t that work out similar to farmers plowing over fields? No downstream jobs and keeping it in the ground definitely takes less workers

-
An opportunity to retrain the workers for the clean energy transition. Once the fossil fuel companies lose their workers, their political influence will be reduced
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do the taxpayers have to pay $20/barrel that's now prevailing or what the market demands when they remove it? It might not be a bad deal if the commitment was to never take it out of the ground, but you know that's not going to happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Welfare queens!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.