It's interesting that one response to our editorial seems to be that public intellectual life just IS about positioning, whereas disagreement and self-doubt should be kept to private conversations and graduate seminars.https://twitter.com/davidsess/status/1086141795547914245 …
-
Show this thread
-
Of course we've never denied that there is a time and place for positioning or framing (certainly, we're all exposed to it every day). But what's being claimed here is that disagreement with "friends"--or even with ourselves--has no place in public intellectual discourse.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @davies_will @jehsmith
Agreed. I think social media presents unique challenges to maintaining public spaces for non-platformable (is that a word?) thinking: somehow it encourages both narrow-casting to "fans" and paranoia about "enemies" at the same time.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @davies_will @BaskinJon
It is precisely this concern that has led me to request removal of the dummy profile of me from the PhilPeople database,
@davidjchalmers 's effort to Tinderize the philosophy profession. So far my request has received no response.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Wrong David Chalmers!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Haha sorry, I'd imagine this isn't the first time this has happened to you!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.