@adamlevitan why cut him? Money savings that has to do with contract language?
Expectation all along is that Forsett will be back and play a significant role on offense in Week One vs. Bills.
-
-
-
Opens up roster spot, and allowed you to hold off on putting two guys on IR where one is now eligible to return.
-
makes sense. interesting though - I wonder why they chose to do that with Forsett over some other guys.
-
can't figure that part out.Forsett had to be agreeable. But might they alter his contract a little? Not sure
-
Interesting that they chose Forsett over another vested veteran, like Chris Carter on minimum salary
-
Agreed. Makes me wonder why they'd choose a player who's a big part of week 1's gameplan.
-
Well he practiced yesterday, players are off today and tomorrow; and he'll be good to go by practice Tuesday. So misses nothing
-
-
-
so where's the re-signing news? Just working on logistics?
-
Yeah, this is the plan/expectation. Nothing is official yet.
-
-
-
Can you explain. The benefit of cutting and resigning him please? I seen it somewhere.
-
It's in link I tweeted out. Basically they used his roster spot, and held off a day on Hester, as placeholder to keep two guys
-
-
-
Is that a confirm on Forsett resigns.
-
I expected him to re-sign all along, and that remains the plan.
-
-
-
what do you think is the earliest he could return?
-
Tomorrow or Tuesday maybe. They're off tomorrow, but I'd be surprised if he's not practicing Tues-Wed
-
cool thanks!
-
-
@rotoworld someone isn't doing research, Forsett was released days ago and you allowed this to post? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4819/justin-forsett … -
Interesting. Forsett was Cut, could have been signed by another team and is going to Play a "Significant Role", in Wk #1. ??
-
-
@rotoworld get it together...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.