Thomas Baekdal
I completely agree with @jeffjarvis here: If people don't know something is satire, it's a deception: "Enough"https://medium.com/redefining-rude/enough-569bae96773e#.mep26mc6d …
-
@baekdal@Lordofmisrule79@makeitsnowondem@serr8d@cobvl@jeffjarvis it’s a good thing you’re not saying that. The Court’s seem to agree
John Doe
Daniel Gershburg
Jeff Jarvis@DanielGershburg certainly neither am i saying that. this was about fraudulent use of name @baekdal
-
-
@jeffjarvis@baekdal but that's seemingly exactly what you're saying. Satire ok so long as (x, y, z). Free speech "but"... It's Orwellian -
@DanielGershburg This is a matter of editorial responsibility. Has nothing to do with 1st Amendment. You know that.@baekdal - View other replies
-
@jeffjarvis@baekdal I was not the one to bring up free speechpic.twitter.com/BNRAOMwPyO
- View other replies
-
.
@DanielGershburg Can I be the one to bring up the Streisand Effect though?@jeffjarvis@baekdal - View other replies
-
@BrowningMachine@jeffjarvis No no... the Streisand effect is when you don't want people to discuss it. -
@baekdal Fair point, but suspect@jeffjarvis continuing objections are worsening the "damage" -
@BrowningMachine@jeffjarvis Well, maybe. But it also helps Jeff point it out allowing people to realize it in the future. -
@baekdal Realize what, please?@jeffjarvis - Show more
-
-
@jeffjarvis@baekdal@danielgershburg So you feel that readers would be confused. Because the writing copies your editorial style?
TexitMachine
davy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.