Babies. Not even a year old. This breaks my heart.https://twitter.com/V_of_Europe/status/1048619674072743939 …
You have a point, except circumcision doesn't impede the ability to be sexually aroused. FGM is designed for exactly that purpose. If girls can't get aroused they can be more easily controlled. It's evil ... and about as misogynistic as you can get.
-
-
Cicumcision severs nerves as well. Why are you defending girls being cut and not males? Cut is cut regardless of the reason for ideological purposes. I'm against all of it but am irritated you couldn't care an iota about boys.
-
There are almost no nerves in that piece of skin. A closer likeness would be to remove the glans but even that’s not as bad nor would lead to the same long term complications. Look up what FGM is & the problems it causes. It causes fistulas in childbirth & other injuries.
-
Well your obviously a femminist that fails to recognize that any kind of mutilation to either sex is wrong. And how would you know how many nerves male's have in foreskin. Almost no nerves? But there is nerves. I don't think your my kind of maga follower. So please don't reply.
-
Nope, no feminism here . . . just facts. Of course they both involve "mutilation" of body parts. But ask yourself this. Many men undergo circumcision as adults, for various reasons. How many women do the same?
-
Who is John Orr? And why am I blocked? I have never seen them before. Weird.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Interesting Jeff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
????????
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.