ClickHouse achieved good (great) results. However, it's a bad comparison. Clickhouse is an analytics DB while Scylla is a realtime, random access one. We could stack 100k rows in a single partition and be 1000x faster. The presented usecase is 100x slower on writes
-
-
-
Hey
@DorLaor. Trying to unpack this. Do you mean you could install ScyllaDB on the same single NUC, change the partitioning configuration (100k rows) and be 1000x times faster than ClickHouse on the same hardware for queries as well as write 100x 8.5M rows/s (so ~ 850M rows/s)?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.