So, I wrote a new VPN (private repos for now: ugly code & no doc). Why? I needed something minimal, fast, over TCP, that doesn’t require any post-configuration to route all the traffic through a server. Existing solutions were way too complicated for the most common use case.
-
-
No. There’s a server, a client, the server NATs client’s packets, and that’s all it does and will do. One command-line to type on each side and you’re all set. Nothing else to configure, not much documentation to read. That’s what I wanted to solve. And it works over TCP port 443
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
dsvpn? stands for "dead simple VPN"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
pm for?
-
Poor man.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
cosedvpn
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
PureVPN?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RTC1-VPN ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is pmvpn means "poor man's vpn"? Might also consider "slim-vpn" or "just-vpn". :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.