It’s currently called pmvpn, but suggestions for a better name before it gets opensourced would be more than welcome.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. There’s a server, a client, the server NATs client’s packets, and that’s all it does and will do. One command-line to type on each side and you’re all set. Nothing else to configure, not much documentation to read. That’s what I wanted to solve. And it works over TCP port 443
-
Wireguard wasn't the right tool?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
QUIC is UDP.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
very interesting stuff. before people jump in w/"have you tried X" you might post a list of the existing software you considered before deciding to write your own, in order to head that off at the pass... (uhm, too late...)
-
(BTW Id've suggested you take a look at Vita :-) https://github.com/inters/vita https://ripe78.ripe.net/presentations/13-high-performance-traffic-encryption-on-x86.pdf … it's based on Snabb, w/bottlenecks hand-optimized in amd64 AVX2/AES-NI instructions for impressive performance on small systems
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
slap a LICENSE on it and upload it. If you're really embarassed by the code, add a README that says "work in progress". If it works at all, it's ready to be seen. Can't discuss code we can't see...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any thoughts about Wireguard? You find it too complicated?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
