Given that the cost of PBKDF2 multiplies as the output length increases, this is probably a good thing. https://www.chosenplaintext.ca/2015/10/08/pbkdf2-design-flaw.html …
-
-
-
One-round PBKDF2 (basically, HMAC in counter mode, no cost here) is used in scrypt and some other things. If cost multiplying is a concert, they should have limited it to the hash output size, not a randomly selected value.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.