This is a fascinating comment in the Economist. It seems obviously wrong, and (they claim) an opinion held by an entire profession. A carbon tax seems like a very good way of partially solving the problem...pic.twitter.com/41WyHKuIjZ
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
I think most of the economists referred to would recognise that carbon taxes are not a complete solution on their own, but they would be an excellent start. They quickly put a hugely powerful & well understood mechanism (price) to work on the most urgent problems.
Maybe they would. But that doesn't appear to be what the Economist is claiming.
I don't think that's incompatible with the Economist's claim. My read on the Economist quote is that it implicitly recognises that political bandwidth is limited, and there is widespread agreement about what the top priority should be. I accept it doesn't say that explicitly tho.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.