And here's @GoodwinMJ's response which, er, backs up my point and contradicts his own claim:https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1223296070211592192?s=20 …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
And now a claim that I'm "misreading his point" by assuming his citing a paper meant I should take his factual claim seriously rather than assuming it was just meaningless blather:https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1223297002118754305?s=20 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Here, belatedly,
@GoodwinMJ concedes that what he said wasn't what the paper claimed, and that he actually meant to say something entirely different. Why does this have to be so painful for him? Why not simply correct the original error?https://twitter.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1223308566783778823?s=20 …Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
See Jonathan, this is why we need economists...
-
TBF
@chrishanretty - who is a political scientist - pointed out some other unsubstantiated/wrong claims in the article https://twitter.com/chrishanretty/status/1223153702896381953?s=20 … Everyone is free to join in! - Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Yawn. Do you even read the papers or you just a Twitter troll now? Ansell and Adler rightly point to rising wealth inequality via housing. See their paper and also the PQ update 1/2
-
They explicitly say that even *non-homeowners* were *more likely* to vote Remain when house prices were *high*. That's precisely the opposite of your claim, isn't it? This isn't hard.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
As I am sure
@GoodwinMJ will explain that is an incorrect conclusion to draw from that graph...or at least Goodwin's view is certainly compatible with the data in that graph...albeit that graph in itself does not actively support his view. -
I don't think you can draw any strong conclusions about causal mechanisms from the graph. But neither the graph nor the paper as a whole provides*any* evidence for Matt's specific claim, as Matt has now accepted (but not corrected)
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
As I read that, it says, non-owners were more likely to vote leave the higher the costs of houses in their area. Home owners voted to STAY in the uk, the higher the value of their home. Or am I reading that backwards?
-
No. Both owners and non owners were more likely to vote Remain, the higher the cost of houses, although the effect was stronger for the former.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.