4/Collins is same judge who held last year that the elected General Assembly is a usurper body without full power to act (since reversed for gross legal error on appeal).
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
5/So, with that background, here’s the new action since Wed.: Thu, Oct 1: Notwithstanding Osteen’s Sept 30 order, Dem state Judge Collins obligingly approved the Dem plaintiffs’ & Elections Bd’s collusive settlement, which would end protections from fraud in absentee balloting.
1 odpowiedź 14 podanych dalej 31 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
6/But, also Oct 1: Judge Osteen issued ANOTHER order noting that when the NCSBE eliminated the witness requirement it used “this court’s preliminary injunction ... to obtain relief this court denied.” He anticipated “an additional injunction” to come.
1 odpowiedź 13 podanych dalej 34 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
7/And then TODAY, in litigation filed last Sat by legislative leaders, Trump campaign, RNC and yours truly, Judge Jim Dever entered this beast of a TRO in Raleigh federal court: http://speakermoore.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Order-granting-TRO.pdf …
1 odpowiedź 15 podanych dalej 40 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
8/Judge Dever’s order recognized that NCSBE’s “settlement” eliminated not only “the statutory witness requirement” but also “the statutory deadline for absentee ballots,” AND the requirement of in-person mailing or delivery by the voter. Pp 7-9
1 odpowiedź 14 podanych dalej 35 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
9/Dever pointedly noted that NCSBE hid the ball from Judge Osteen and found that it “materially changed the rules under which the election was taking place” on Oct 2, after “319,209 NC voters had cast absentee ballots. Pp 9, 14 Then Judge Dever really unloaded:
1 odpowiedź 17 podanych dalej 35 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
10/“At bottom, the NCSBE has ignored the statutory scheme and arbitrarily created multiple, disparate regimes under which N.C. voters cast absentee ballots.” ...
1 odpowiedź 15 podanych dalej 37 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
11/“The NCSBE inequitably and materially upset the electoral status quo in the middle of an election by issuing the memoranda and giving the memoranda legal effect via the October 2, 2020 consent judgment.” ...
1 odpowiedź 16 podanych dalej 34 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
12/“The memoranda, by materially changing the electoral process in the middle of an election after over 300,000 people have voted, undermines that confidence and creates confusion for those North Carolinians who have yet to cast their ballots.” Pp 15
1 odpowiedź 16 podanych dalej 35 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
13/Judge Dever restrained all of these actions and transferred the new cases to Judge Osteen for further proceedings.
1 odpowiedź 14 podanych dalej 32 polubionePokaż ten wątek
14/Remember, this is the politicized manipulation of the State Board of Elections by Roy Cooper, under legal advice by Josh Stein, in collusion with Marc Elias, facilitated by Dem Judge Collins. Cooper, Stein and Collins are all candidates on this year’s ballot. Brazen.
-
-
15/Oct 7 in Judge Osteen’s court in Greensboro is going to be
So far, timely action by federal judges has prevented corrupt state officials and partisans from using a rogue state judge to throw open this election to widespread fraud. May they stick to their guns. #ncpol9 odpowiedzi 42 podane dalej 106 polubionychPokaż ten wątekDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
