Thomas Farr’s history speaks for itself. Google him.https://twitter.com/jdanbishop/status/1068324423596425216 …
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @oheystephj
I know him well. Don’t have to Google him. Tell me what condemns him. Not what your echo chamber says. What you know.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @jdanbishop
You know the issues including history of racially motivated politics up through “almost surgical precision.” Appreciate the personal nature of your response, but I make a point to avoid the echo chamber.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @oheystephj
The single specific you cite was three liberal judges reversing the opposite fact finding by the district court judge, simultaneously stressing that they did not ascribe racial motivations to a single legislator, after which the leftist AG sabotaged the appeal. Best you got?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @jdanbishop
No, I also cite his history of racially motivated politics which, to my knowledge, he has never disavowed. As for the decision, I think it was correct, but if you want to point to partisan/biased judges as a problem, then that's also my point, and maybe we've found common ground.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @oheystephj
What history? Give specifics, not smears. That’s exactly the point. And BTW, whether or not the decision was correct as a matter of law (and are you saying you’ve studied the underlying law so that you can make that judgment, or just that you like it?) ... /1
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @jdanbishop @oheystephj
... defending before courts legislation passed by the elected representatives of the people must not be taken to impugn the character of the professional advocate. If that is your side’s position, it is a lawless, gutter-level fight to the death. If that’s your game, ok
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @jdanbishop
I believe his history of racially biased politics means he doesn't meet the standard for the federal bench. It's just business, Dan.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
He has no such history. You can’t cite a single example. Given that, to join in a chorus of liars to advance the smear should be the farthest thing from just business. The fact that your side traffics in this is why I am here and will bear any burden to fight it.
-
-
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
