Thomas Farr’s history speaks for itself. Google him.https://twitter.com/jdanbishop/status/1068324423596425216 …
-
What history? Give specifics, not smears. That’s exactly the point. And BTW, whether or not the decision was correct as a matter of law (and are you saying you’ve studied the underlying law so that you can make that judgment, or just that you like it?) ... /1
... defending before courts legislation passed by the elected representatives of the people must not be taken to impugn the character of the professional advocate. If that is your side’s position, it is a lawless, gutter-level fight to the death. If that’s your game, ok
-
-
I believe his history of racially biased politics means he doesn't meet the standard for the federal bench. It's just business, Dan.
-
He has no such history. You can’t cite a single example. Given that, to join in a chorus of liars to advance the smear should be the farthest thing from just business. The fact that your side traffics in this is why I am here and will bear any burden to fight it.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.