Thomas Farr’s history speaks for itself. Google him.https://twitter.com/jdanbishop/status/1068324423596425216 …
-
No, I also cite his history of racially motivated politics which, to my knowledge, he has never disavowed. As for the decision, I think it was correct, but if you want to point to partisan/biased judges as a problem, then that's also my point, and maybe we've found common ground.
What history? Give specifics, not smears. That’s exactly the point. And BTW, whether or not the decision was correct as a matter of law (and are you saying you’ve studied the underlying law so that you can make that judgment, or just that you like it?) ... /1
-
-
I'm saying I agree with it. And I'm not here to give specifics - hence the Google reference.
-
Proving my point.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
... defending before courts legislation passed by the elected representatives of the people must not be taken to impugn the character of the professional advocate. If that is your side’s position, it is a lawless, gutter-level fight to the death. If that’s your game, ok
-
I believe his history of racially biased politics means he doesn't meet the standard for the federal bench. It's just business, Dan.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.