Of the six former Chief Justices who want Gov. to retain untrammeled control of judicial vacancy appointments, all received such appointments: Billings (1985, 1986), Frye (1983, 1999), Lake (1985, 1992), Mitchell (1977, 1982, 1994), Exum (1967), Parker (1984, 2006).
-
Wait. So the current process (in existence for 150 years) has in the last three decades produced six remarkable Chief Justices. Sounds worth keeping.
To acknowledge that some good resulted from 150 years of iron-fisted, one-party rule is no argument for preserving its mechanisms. Of all the methods in use for picking judges, NONE commend leaving it to one person's whim. The Bev Purdue experience is all the evidence needed.
-
-
Personally if it were me I’d go with Gubernatorial nomination and Senate confirmation
-
So we agree that a change is needed.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.