these assertions range from being demonstrably false to disingenuous to delusionalpic.twitter.com/Tbl6FxkbCU
Show this thread
-
-
-
sinema’s argument amounts to an argument against the exercise of power at all since, if you use it, what happens when the other side does too?
Show this thread -
there are a lot of things that are just left unanswered — how does a simple majority threshold for legislation preclude bipartisan negotiation? — but one thing worth noting is that, technically, the filibuster requires a supermajority to end debate, not to pass a bill.
Show this thread -
sinema’s argument, in actuality, is that democrats should not be able to vote on legislation without substantial republican approval
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It really is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
weak or bribed?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
At this ping is take a talking filibuster. What’s their excuse for not doing that?
-
Point I’d take. Grr
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.