if an accurate reading of your lede depends on connecting the clause “for the purpose of” to a sentence roughly 500 words down the page, then there is a structural problem in the writing
-
-
Show this thread
-
If I were your editor Crank, I would have suggested you write something like: “Democrats believe the Georgia law is a gambit to help the GOP win elections by undermining fair elections, but it is their coordination of an unaccountable corporate response that is anti-democratic.”https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/1382472852759265282 …
Show this thread -
The words you wrote do not effectively transmit the idea you are trying to communicate. Like I said, they suggest the opposite.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
God damn man, that’s cold.
-
If a teacher wrote this on my college paper I’d die and drop out of school.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“throat-clearing for the length of a column before getting to your point”pic.twitter.com/lLcFEHczNI
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They all want to be Buckley, but haven't got the skill at Rhetoric.
-
I mean all you need to do to be Buckley is threaten to beat up a "queer" for saying something you don't like.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
To be fair, he's still wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.