There is one main argument against paedobaptism (infant baptism). And that is this: You don't have to do it. Nothing in Scripture mandates it, and there's not one example of it. Everyone must repent and be baptized. No one must baptize their children who have yet to repent.
-
-
The expansion of the sign to 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 baby boys and girls is not a problem; to exclude both would be.
-
The assumptions needed to protect this tradition is amazing. Again, suddenly exegesis changes when it comes to it.
-
A tradition which is held by everyone bar a handful of individuals up to the radical reformation. And again, as I note the Baptist, if held to the same, standard could not consistently baptize mentally impaired people.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.