I'm not sure the incel argument is inherently misogynistic. They are turning to misogyny because there's no coherent explanation on the left. Maybe an easier way to think about it is female incels. Wouldn't we normally sympathize?https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots-redistribution.html …
-
-
Well and that's the discomfort that I'm talking about. No one wants to confirm the existence of something that incels will use to justify misogyny. Just winging this topic, but I thought it's involuntarily celibate. Plenty of those women too, no?
-
Involuntary celibacy itself is also incoherent.https://twitter.com/mountain_goats/status/989297058782830593?s=21 …
-
I’m sorry to be so hard-headed about this, but I think the argument for the justice of desire can easily be separated from the incel conversation. The majority of people who are harmed by inequitable desire politics are not incels.
-
It's all good. Misogyny is off-putting, and rightfully so. I like that: inequitable desire politics. Yes, somehow it has to be ok to confirm that there is this phenomenon of inequitable desire, but at the same time deny the incel's misogynistic response and entitlement.
-
I wasn't articulate enough on this subject, but I'm on board with this takehttps://twitter.com/brosandprose/status/991704241810046976 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.