Jayshree Bajoria

@jayshreebajoria

Human Rights Watch. RTs not endorsements, views personal.

加入2011年3月
164 個相片或影片 圖片與影片

推文

你已封鎖 @jayshreebajoria

你確定要查看這些推文嗎？查看推文並不會將 @jayshreebajoria 解除封鎖

  1. 已轉推
    6 小時前

    As a river (the ) dies: India could be facing its ‘greatest human catastrophe’ ever

    2 replies 50 則轉推 34 個喜歡
  2. 已轉推
    6 小時前

    As we now descend into the legally absurd.

    Privacy is a concept, not fundamental right: Maharashtra to SC
    5 則轉推 3 個喜歡
  3. 已轉推
    13 小時前

    A Look Back at Michiko Kakutani’s 38 Years Reviewing Books via

    5 則轉推 5 個喜歡
  4. 已轉推
    15 小時前

    Right to Privacy Multifaceted, So Can't Be Fundamental, Centre Tells SC via

    1 replies 13 則轉推 15 個喜歡
  5. 已轉推
    18 小時前

    Right To Food Campaign Joins Issue With Attorney General On

    3 replies 7 則轉推 11 個喜歡
  6. 已轉推
    7 小時前

    I'm so proud of a new initiative at : the HT Hate-Tracker, a running catalogue of identity-based crime.

    33 replies 242 則轉推 308 個喜歡
  7. 已轉推
    19 小時前

    The right to privacy case in the Supreme Court will touch every aspect of life. Rich or poor. It is a fight for the control of your destiny.

    13 replies 181 則轉推 190 個喜歡
  8. 18 小時前

    :-)

    回覆給 @gautambhatia88
    AS: Can I come to court and say I have a fundamental right to watch pornography in my home? Chelameswar J: Why not?
  9. 已轉推
    23 小時前
    回覆給

    Time up. To resume on Tuesday. Arghya Sengupta has given written submissions for Haryana. Bench has risen.

    12 replies 13 則轉推 22 個喜歡
  10. 已轉推
    7月27日

    Wonderful news! Congratulations to the Oracle of Jor Bagh, patron saint of unwell vultures, local girl made good

    Arundhati Roy’s second novel makes it to this year’s Man Booker Prize longlist
    4 replies 23 則轉推 49 個喜歡
  11. 已轉推
    7月27日

    case shows failure of military justice system in investigating violations -

    18 則轉推 10 個喜歡
  12. 已轉推
    7月27日
    回覆給

    CAS says we cannot elevate privacy to liberty or any other FR. Bench rises for lunch. CAS to resume after lunch.

    6 replies 11 則轉推 8 個喜歡
  13. 7月27日

    Completely inaccurate. Aadhar nothing like SSN in US. Yet govt uses this argument in court.

    回覆給 @prasanna_s
    KKV showing how SSN forms and Aadhaar forms are comparable. Reading one field by one.
    1 個喜歡
  14. 已轉推
    7月27日
    回覆給

    Attorney General says that the fact that an act was passed to protect privacy means there is no fundamental right to privacy.

    1 replies 6 則轉推
  15. 已轉推
    7月27日
    回覆給

    Nariman J also asks the same question as Bobde. Wants to know the reason for UIDAI disputing FR to privacy.

    3 replies 22 則轉推 13 個喜歡
  16. 已轉推
    7月27日
    回覆給

    GS gets up to say that all enrolment agencies and BSPs are private agencies and we have a lot to say about that before the right bench.

    2 replies 19 則轉推 16 個喜歡
  17. 已轉推
    7月27日
    回覆給

    Bobde J.. so you have enacted this to protect privacy. Then why are you disputing the right.

    2 replies 28 則轉推 20 個喜歡
  18. 已轉推
    7月27日
    回覆給

    J. Chandrachud: State may have legitimate interest with respect to Aadhaar but there has to be a robust mechanism to ensure security of data

    1 replies 8 則轉推 1 個喜歡
  19. 已轉推
    7月27日

    Day 4 of the Right to Privacy hearings will commence at 10 30, Government to continue arguments. Follow and for updates.

    2 replies 7 則轉推 3 個喜歡
  20. 已轉推
    7月27日

    Today: State to resume its arguments in the Right to Privacy matter before a nine judge Constitution bench.

    2 replies 9 則轉推 11 個喜歡

@jayshreebajoria 尚未發表任何推文。

看來要一段時間讀取資料。

Twitter 可能已超出負載，或發生暫時性的小問題。請再試一次，或造訪 Twitter 狀態以取得更多資訊。

    你也可能也會喜歡

    ·