Jayshree Bajoria

@jayshreebajoria

Human Rights Watch. RTs not endorsements, views personal.

加入于 2011年3月
164 个照片和视频 照片和视频

推文

你屏蔽了 @jayshreebajoria

确定要查看这些推文吗？查看推文不会取消屏蔽 @jayshreebajoria

  1. 转推了
    6小时前

    As a river (the ) dies: India could be facing its ‘greatest human catastrophe’ ever

    2回复 50 转推 34 喜欢
  2. 转推了
    6小时前

    As we now descend into the legally absurd.

    Privacy is a concept, not fundamental right: Maharashtra to SC
    5 转推 3 喜欢
  3. 转推了
    13小时前

    A Look Back at Michiko Kakutani’s 38 Years Reviewing Books via

    5 转推 5 喜欢
  4. 转推了
    15小时前

    Right to Privacy Multifaceted, So Can't Be Fundamental, Centre Tells SC via

    1回复 13 转推 15 喜欢
  5. 转推了
    18小时前

    Right To Food Campaign Joins Issue With Attorney General On

    3回复 7 转推 11 喜欢
  6. 转推了
    7小时前

    I'm so proud of a new initiative at : the HT Hate-Tracker, a running catalogue of identity-based crime.

    33回复 242 转推 308 喜欢
  7. 转推了
    19小时前

    The right to privacy case in the Supreme Court will touch every aspect of life. Rich or poor. It is a fight for the control of your destiny.

    13回复 181 转推 190 喜欢
  8. 18小时前

    :-)

    回复 @gautambhatia88
    AS: Can I come to court and say I have a fundamental right to watch pornography in my home? Chelameswar J: Why not?
  9. 转推了
    23小时前
    回复

    Time up. To resume on Tuesday. Arghya Sengupta has given written submissions for Haryana. Bench has risen.

    12回复 13 转推 22 喜欢
  10. 转推了
    7月27日

    Wonderful news! Congratulations to the Oracle of Jor Bagh, patron saint of unwell vultures, local girl made good

    Arundhati Roy’s second novel makes it to this year’s Man Booker Prize longlist
    4回复 23 转推 49 喜欢
  11. 转推了
    7月27日

    case shows failure of military justice system in investigating violations -

    18 转推 10 喜欢
  12. 转推了
    7月27日
    回复

    CAS says we cannot elevate privacy to liberty or any other FR. Bench rises for lunch. CAS to resume after lunch.

    6回复 11 转推 8 喜欢
  13. 7月27日

    Completely inaccurate. Aadhar nothing like SSN in US. Yet govt uses this argument in court.

    回复 @prasanna_s
    KKV showing how SSN forms and Aadhaar forms are comparable. Reading one field by one.
    1 喜欢
  14. 转推了
    7月27日
    回复

    Attorney General says that the fact that an act was passed to protect privacy means there is no fundamental right to privacy.

    1回复 6 转推
  15. 转推了
    7月27日
    回复

    Nariman J also asks the same question as Bobde. Wants to know the reason for UIDAI disputing FR to privacy.

    3回复 22 转推 13 喜欢
  16. 转推了
    7月27日
    回复

    GS gets up to say that all enrolment agencies and BSPs are private agencies and we have a lot to say about that before the right bench.

    2回复 19 转推 16 喜欢
  17. 转推了
    7月27日
    回复

    Bobde J.. so you have enacted this to protect privacy. Then why are you disputing the right.

    2回复 28 转推 20 喜欢
  18. 转推了
    7月27日
    回复

    J. Chandrachud: State may have legitimate interest with respect to Aadhaar but there has to be a robust mechanism to ensure security of data

    1回复 8 转推 1 喜欢
  19. 转推了
    7月27日

    Day 4 of the Right to Privacy hearings will commence at 10 30, Government to continue arguments. Follow and for updates.

    2回复 7 转推 3 喜欢
  20. 转推了
    7月27日

    Today: State to resume its arguments in the Right to Privacy matter before a nine judge Constitution bench.

    2回复 9 转推 11 喜欢

@jayshreebajoria 尚未发过任何推文。

加载似乎需要一段时间。

Twitter 可能超载或出现了暂时故障。重试或访问 Twitter 状态以了解更多信息。

    你可能还喜欢

    ·