Here is how the Los Angeles Times put it on July 14: “We shouldn’t rise to his bait, but how can we not? If we ignore him, we normalize his reckless behavior, and that’s even worse.” https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-trump-aoc-squad-ilhan-bigoted-tweets-20190714-story.html … Welcome to my new THREAD, where I try to solve this problem. 1/
-
-
Journalists cannot ignore his acting out when it may have geopolitical consequences, or trigger suffering in real people, even when they know that Trump's latest outrage may be a ploy for news coverage, and the ploy may be part of an attention cycle in which they are caught. 8/
Show this thread -
This problem is real, not just a matter of spine. If the President decides it's okay to say to some of his fellow Americans go back where you came from, or to advise elected members of Congress to leave the country if they have complaints about it... 9/
Show this thread -
...by what defensible code can journalists decline to share with their publics these surprising, disturbing, and consequential facts ("if you don't like it here, leave!") even IF they believe them to be a ploy for media attention or meant to keep his base in a pop-eyed state. 10/
Show this thread -
There is no such code. They have to report it, because with the American executive it is often true that words are actions. If journalists took the advice never to take the bait they would often be taking a holiday from their most basic responsibility: to say what happened. 11/
Show this thread -
But that is not the end of the story. We can do better than the mournful ask of the LA Times: “We shouldn’t rise to his bait, but how can we not? If we ignore him, we normalize his reckless behavior." Take the bait or normalize Trump: these are NOT the only choices. Read on! 12/
Show this thread -
Here are some options I think national newsrooms have: One is to suspend normal relations with the Trump government, a step I have written about before. http://pressthink.org/2018/06/its-time-for-the-press-to-suspend-normal-relations-with-the-trump-presidency/ … Each newsroom has to start asking: what "game" do we stop participating in with this government? 13/
Show this thread -
For CNN, never going live to a Trump campaign event — on the grounds that you will inevitably broadcast falsehoods if you do so — would be a plausible start. Again, take the bait or normalize the toddler are not the only choices. Suspend normal relations is a further choice. 14/
Show this thread -
If you don't want to take the bait, but you feel you cannot ignore — and by ignoring accept — his behavior, then a distinction worth making is between coverage in which Trump is the protagonist, and coverage where his actions are reported, but he is not the main character. 15/
Show this thread -
I bring to your attention this reply from Antonia Hylton, a producer and correspondent at Vice News. https://twitter.com/ahylton26/status/1151112204546191362 … 16/
Show this thread -
The Truth Sandwich is third on my list of choices newsrooms have beyond 'take the bait' or 'ignore the toddler.' First you say what is. Only then do you report his latest falsehood. Then you repeat what is actually the case. That is the truth sandwich. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/instead-of-trumps-propaganda-how-about-a-nice-truth-sandwich/2018/06/15/80df8c36-70af-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html … 17/
Show this thread -
Number four on my list of choices newsrooms have beyond 'take the bait' or 'ignore the toddler' is to recognize that sometimes the news he made today is meant only to bring opacity to news he made yesterday. https://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/1152223575031635968 … That is gaslighting. It should be resisted. 18/
Show this thread -
People knew what the Spotlight team was for at Boston Globe, and sent things to it. They will learn what the Gaslight Desk is for and refer things to it. Imagine editors telling front line reporting teams not to bother with Trump's latest because Gaslight would be handling. 19/
Show this thread -
Fifth on my list of choices beyond 'take the bait' or 'ignore the toddler' is to anchor 2020 coverage in a transparent and public agenda that derives from a creative act of listening. http://pressthink.org/2019/06/key-steps-in-the-citizens-agenda-style-of-campaign-coverage/ … You have to know what your community wants the campaign to be about. 20/
Show this thread -
Newsrooms of America: You cannot keep from getting sucked into Trump’s agenda without a firm grasp on your own. But where does that agenda come from? It can’t come from the journalists. Who cares what they think? It has to originate with the voters you are trying to inform. 21/
Show this thread -
Summarizing my tips for the American press: Suspend normal relations with the Trump regime. Try it this way: his actions are reported, but he is not the main character. Move the Truth Sandwich up on your menu. Open a Gaslight Desk. Anchor your journalism in a citizens agenda. 22/
Show this thread -
We know it's coming: more outrageous stunts and offensive remarks. More reckless, otherizing behavior. All of it fully newsworthy by pre-Trump standards. But are those the right standards, now that we have seen repeated "this hack of just acting outrageously and offensively?" 23/
Show this thread -
No, you shouldn't rise to his bait. But that doesn't mean you can ignore him, either. Journalists need more agile and creative options beyond these two. That is what this thread has been about. Thanks for following it to the end. 24/
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.