Jay RosenVerifisert konto

@jayrosen_nyu

I teach journalism at NYU, critique the press, direct . PressThink is the name of my subject and my site. Started blogging in 2003. Still at it.

New York City jr3@nyu.edu
pressthink.org
Registrerte seg mai 2008
3 504 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @jayrosen_nyu

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@jayrosen_nyu.

  1. for 5 timer siden

    I agree with Jesse. Very good series. This link should work for non-subscribers.

    This WSJ Facebook series definitely proves how little Zuckerberg & the company care about causing devastating harm as long as there’s profit in it. One of the most important series on an American corporation in years.
    8 svar 61 retweets 132 liker
    Angre
  2. Retweetet
    for 17 timer siden

    Awful new poll findings: * 76% of those who trust Fox News or other right wing media believe 2020 was stolen * Only 12% of those who trust those right wing media sources blame 1/6 on Trump. 64% blame leftists Right wing media is helping wreck democracy:

    160 svar 963 retweets 1 907 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  3. for 13 timer siden

    Some of you have not seen this thread of mine from earlier this year, so I am reposting. It's about the key distinctions I rely on in my teaching, writing and criticism.

    "When in doubt, draw a distinction." Not sure where he got it, but in grad school one of my teachers told me that. Some of the best advice I ever received. This THREAD is about some of the key distinctions I draw on to do my work. If you're into that kind of thing.😎 Ready? 1/
    Vis denne tråden
    6 svar 11 retweets 52 liker
    Angre
  4. for 16 timer siden

    "The company’s research on Instagram... represents one of the clearest gaps revealed in the documents between Facebook’s understanding of itself and its public position." This link to should work for everyone, subscriber or not.

    8 svar 51 retweets 109 liker
    Angre
  5. for 17 timer siden

    This profile of Tucker Carlson tries to explain how he got that way. Two answers emerge. One: he was always that "debate me!" guy, going back to prep school. The other: he tried fact-based, conservative-leaning journalism and there was no market for it.

    10 svar 47 retweets 192 liker
    Angre
  6. Retweetet
    15. sep.

    Next Wednesday at 12:30 ET, join for a virtual roundtable “Archiving Trump: Cruelties, Corruption, and Citational Complexity” with , , & @LeahRigeur

    14 retweets 22 liker
    Angre
  7. 15. sep.

    Congrats to the TV producers and journalists who devoted air time to Caitlyn Jenner. She got one percent of the vote last night. Good call.

    111 svar 317 retweets 1 936 liker
    Angre
  8. 15. sep.

    This thread is about where news made specifically for the Republican base is going.

    One America News Network's handling of the GOP defeat in California has been so, so weird that I have to tell you about it. (1/7)
    Vis denne tråden
    8 svar 31 retweets 76 liker
    Angre
  9. Retweetet
    15. sep.

    Thanks for asking me. Before we get to "how to cover," we need decisions from the big newsrooms. Are they willing to decide who's a bad actor, or is that something to be left to others? Does responsible news coverage penalize bad actors, or does it merely describe their actions?

    How should the media, part. Congressional reporters, foreign policy beat reporters, cover such truly bad faith actors?
    Vis denne tråden
    16 svar 54 retweets 175 liker
    Angre
  10. 15. sep.

    Thanks for asking me. Before we get to "how to cover," we need decisions from the big newsrooms. Are they willing to decide who's a bad actor, or is that something to be left to others? Does responsible news coverage penalize bad actors, or does it merely describe their actions?

    How should the media, part. Congressional reporters, foreign policy beat reporters, cover such truly bad faith actors?
    Vis denne tråden
    16 svar 54 retweets 175 liker
    Angre
  11. 15. sep.

    My interest in the Elizabeth Holmes trial was at 10.0 even before this.

    13 svar 45 retweets 141 liker
    Angre
  12. 14. sep.

    Well, Hallelujah. This is Dan Hirschhorn, senior politics editor at the Philadelphia Inquirer, talking to .

    5 svar 69 retweets 298 liker
    Angre
  13. 14. sep.

    It's fun to follow the goings-on at in the UK, a news channel that wants to be Foxy, Trumpy and Brexitty but doesn't want to say it's that, which creates an instability that keep revealing itself in headlines like this.

    2 svar 9 retweets 34 liker
    Angre
  14. 14. sep.

    “Sounds like the next Batman movie." That was Dean Baquet's comment on the Washington Post slogan “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” The new promotional campaign for the New York Times is, "The truth takes a journalist." The theme is discover our people.

    25 svar 7 retweets 52 liker
    Angre
  15. 14. sep.

    Another illustration of how the "both sides with press in the middle" model for covering politics cannot survive the full emergence of the contemporary Republican Party, which is anti-democratic at the base and at the top.

    4 svar 66 retweets 144 liker
    Angre
  16. 14. sep.

    Some of you know I have been advocating over many years for an alternative in election coverage: the citizens agenda model. Slowly it is catching on among local newsrooms. Here's a report on how used it recently.

    5 svar 31 retweets 86 liker
    Angre
  17. 12. sep.

    Jeremy live blogged (in English) the TV debate among party leaders ahead of the German election.

    And yet again this was *so* much better than 2017. Substantive issues, including unsexy but important ones like housing and pensions plus a big section on climate change, discussed in a broadly grown-up way that set out real differences.
    Vis denne tråden
    2 svar 6 retweets 30 liker
    Angre
  18. 12. sep.

    We live in a two-party system and one of the two is anti-democratic. For political reporters that's a challenge. Here the meets the moment by refusing to describe the latest hyper-politicized recount as an "audit." via

    82 svar 1 162 retweets 3 530 liker
    Angre
  19. Retweetet
    10. sep.

    “So is this really how it’s going to be?“ asks in this crucial piece, as GOP candidates are openly casting any potential election losses as illegitimate. The answer, sadly, has to be yes – because this is what the Republican Party has become. Some thoughts: 1/

    This is ominous. I've compiled numerous examples of high-profile GOP candidates who are vowing to contest future losses as illegitimate. In GOP politics, this is becoming a badge of honor, and that's a serious threat to democratic stability. My latest:
    Vis denne tråden
    15 svar 273 retweets 525 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  20. 11. sep.

    For 13 years my Twitter following has been growing. Not any more. I've been on a Twitter slow down since summer, posting about one third as much as I did. Why? Fewer people click through to the link now. Too often I know what the insta-reaction will be, and decide to say nothing.

    93 svar 37 retweets 739 liker
    Angre

@jayrosen_nyu har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·