Jason WillickVerified account

@jawillick

Editorial Page Writer . Email: jason.willick@wsj.com

New York City
Joined November 2011

Tweets

You blocked @jawillick

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @jawillick

  1. Retweeted
    6 hours ago

    Both impressed by the class solidarity and appalled by the sycophancy of all the passed-over natsec types proclaiming the supreme worthiness of their dear friends who got the tap

    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    Nov 22

    What would the Electoral College score be if the 2020 Census reapportionment were in place? Per this projection, +4 for Trump states, or Biden 302-236 rather than 306-232. A modest change, but means the 269-269 and 270-268 maps could instead reflect GOP wins in '24.

    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    9 hours ago

    An excellent editorial. If all foreign policy agenda items are first fed through the climate lens — a portfolio led by John Kerry of all people — we’ve potentially got a recipe for disaster. 1/4

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Retweeted

    EDITORIAL Joe Biden’s initial choices for national security posts are largely reassuring, but John Kerry as climate czar is catnip for China. via

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. “For all of the protests about President Trump’s misguided Twitter attacks on Mr. Powell, the Fed has been moving toward becoming an arm of the Treasury for some time.”

    Undo
  6. It won’t be Obama’s third term, but expect establishment virtues and a climate focus. ⁦⁩ on the Biden team

    Undo
  7. Nov 23
    Undo
  8. Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Nov 22

    Loyalty is not infallible. But Antony Blinken is someone Biden has known for decades. By his own account, Trump knew Rex Tillerson for an hour.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Retweeted

    Transcript of a wide-ranging conversation this summer between Blinken and Walter Russell Mead at the Hudson Institute:

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Nov 22

    What would the Electoral College score be if the 2020 Census reapportionment were in place? Per this projection, +4 for Trump states, or Biden 302-236 rather than 306-232. A modest change, but means the 269-269 and 270-268 maps could instead reflect GOP wins in '24.

    Undo
  12. Retweeted

    Russiagate/Cambridge Analytica: "Misleading memes and videos went viral in some Anglo communities."

    Undo
  13. Nov 20

    Has anyone calculated what the Electoral College count would be if states gave electors by congressional district?

    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    Nov 20

    Kamala’s coattails: Republicans pick up more House seats in California than any other state.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Nov 20

    Is Wall Street Turning Blue? (2020) "We demonstrate that since the early 1990’s, it is becoming increasingly common for firms to be run by CEOs who are aligned with the Democratic Party..." "...the trend appears to be quite pervasive, as nearly 75% of industries turned bluer."

    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Nov 20

    Though the ~24% probability reflects the chance of Democrats winning *both* races, while the remainder reflects GOP winning either one or two.

    Undo
  17. Nov 20

    Bettors have soured somewhat on GOP in Georgia over the past week.

    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    Nov 20

    Part of the reason Biden is hiring people with ties to tech but not ties to Wall Street is simple: If you left Biden’s VP office around ~2012, working for Wall Street was politically poisonous, but working for Facebook/Google/Apple was not.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Nov 19
    Undo
  20. Nov 18
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·