So here's a weird thing about the early stock market: It was common for a long time to buy stock in a company by paying only a fraction of the share price, and to pay the rest in installments over time. When did we end this, and why?
-
-
In any case the whole model certainly seems suboptimal compared to today's model of having multiple rounds of investment, each of which is paid in full, each priced separately. But when and how did we figure this out?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Oh, another wacky thing: During the South Sea Bubble around 1720, when the South Sea Company sold shares above par value, they booked the excess as *revenue*. So they could report *profits* from doing nothing other than selling shares—and then pay those out as dividends!
Prikaži ovu nit -
Basically the whole thing was a Ponzi scheme (and Ponzi himself wouldn't come along for another 200 years). Fortunately today we have accounting standards that don't let you play this particular trick. Again, fascinating to see all the mistakes we had to make along the way
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Seems to just be a debt.
-
Makes sense, but what if you fail to pay the debt? Can the company revoke some or all of your ownership? Is the equity itself collateral for the loan?
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The called up capital was forfeited on failure to pay the calls and shares we're re issued post that . PS they still teach this Indian schools instead of the current system :) .
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.