I *think* this was called “subscription”, but today a “stock subscription” means something different, so it's hard to Google for.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
I haven't figured out yet if you paid the rest in regular installments, or if there were capital calls by the company when they needed cash. Also not sure what happened if you failed to make payments—did you forfeit your equity?
Prikaži ovu nit -
In any case the whole model certainly seems suboptimal compared to today's model of having multiple rounds of investment, each of which is paid in full, each priced separately. But when and how did we figure this out?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Oh, another wacky thing: During the South Sea Bubble around 1720, when the South Sea Company sold shares above par value, they booked the excess as *revenue*. So they could report *profits* from doing nothing other than selling shares—and then pay those out as dividends!
Prikaži ovu nit -
Basically the whole thing was a Ponzi scheme (and Ponzi himself wouldn't come along for another 200 years). Fortunately today we have accounting standards that don't let you play this particular trick. Again, fascinating to see all the mistakes we had to make along the way
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
My hunch is that 1929 happened
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
VC has often stepped disbursements so its not uncanny. Its pointless for the public stockmarket
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Maybe share prices were higher relative to average incomes?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.