Dunno the laws in GA, but morally shooting someone in the back when they're running away (esp if they are running in fear!) is a weak position.
Conversation
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Back in the day when I ran with people that (responsibly) owned guns, the consensus was for home defense the first round or two is snake shot. If that doesn't persuade someone, lethal force is probably necessary.
2
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Snake shot at close quarters will fuck a motherfucker up, but won't go thru drywall, which is my bigger fear. But I also figure if the first is snake and the second lethal, there's not a huge timing difference if you already have a bead
1
1
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Putting aside the debate over whether the shooting was justified, on a broader level we need to ask ourselves how this situation escalated to the point it did. A man sleeping off alcohol in his car should not end up with his death.
Whether there needs to be a change in policy..
1
1
...or a different approach, we shouldn't tolerate the number of fatal shootings by police in our society.
Debating the actual shooting, I believe the officers would need to feel an immediate threat to their life before discharging their firearms. While he was fleeing, he did...
1
1
Turn around and discharge the taser at one of the officers. I don't know enough about Georgia law in this situation to argue whether the shooting was justifiable, what I can say is that this situation should not have escalated to someone's death.
1
1
Tasers have an effective range of 15 feet and are effectively one and done. Cops know this, they're trained in their use
IDK law their either, but the police chief resigned because of it before there was even an inquiry so I assume it was dead wrong
1
2
I believe one of the major issues in this circumstance is determining if the officers involved had a legitimate fear that their life was in jeopardy at the time of the shooting.
I believe it was a bad shoot but at the same time if they charge the officer with murder, it will
Set a high bar for the jury. My feeling is that a charge of voluntary manslaughter has a better chance of succeeding in a trial.
Have they pressed charges yet?
1
1
Show replies