If a whistleblower had come forward to say Trump had privately told Xi he should launch an investigation into the Bidens, it'd be a huge story. That's what Trump just did publicly.
602
8,173
31.7K
Conversation
Replying to
WHY are Republicans even trying to defend this?!
I mean...how can you?
The evidence is indisputable. 🤷🏼♀️
22
25
261
It's indefensible. Anyone who claims this is proper doesn't understand law, the Constitution and I'd doubt they understood what being "an America" really meant.
2
6
So What Biden said on video is defensible.. Really ...what a joke... he can bribe a country with holding back money and his son walks away with Millions and that's not corrupt. If you agree with that & think that's being American and you better look at yourself in the mirror.
1
This is exactly why the cult of disinformation is so dangerous to our country. I don't know you or what your beliefs are, but we can both agree that what Trump has done regardless of Biden's past actions.
It's irrelevant -- Trump broke the law and his actions are impeachable.
2
2
Biden does not a get a free pass because it's assumed Trump broke the law. If the Rep's investigated Obama like the Dems are Trump then they would have found several impeachable offenses against the Beloved Obama. I admit the Rep's are too soft. Trump's not going to be impeached.
1
I agree 100% -- Biden should not get a pass if he committed a crime. My only question is what crime is he accused of and what evidence / source is there for the accusations.
I leave here in six hours you either fire the prosecutor or you don't get the money. Correct me if I'm wrong but that falls under quid pro quo and enough to start an investigation on it. If Trump's phone call is so cut-and-dry then why did Nadler change the narrative of it.
1
Who told you he changed the narrative? You have to be VERY careful about the sources you trust because there is a lot of mis/disinformation out there and it causes a lot of problems (this is a good example).
1
2
Show replies