Jason KintOvjeren akaunt

@jason_kint

CEO of Digital Content Next - Advancing the Future of Trusted Content. Media strategy, occasional Buckeyes, Yanks, dad, banter. CBS alum.

DC, NYC
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @jason_kint

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @jason_kint

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    Finally. Here in SEC docs is what Facebook has painfully avoided public knowing and press has mostly missed documenting. Facebook data was ****SOLD**** to Cambridge Analytica. Can everyone please now say that Facebook personal data was sold rather than captured, transferred, etc?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Google makes more money from off-google advertising than from Youtube directly, apparently always has. Yet google tells analysts & reporters that efforts to kill cookies and throw up new data flow walls like the SameSite change won’t impact their bottom line. This seems dubious.

    Poništi
  3. a different look at it.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. Reminder: GOOGle has been steadily shifting its revenue mix towards its own properties for years. Traffic and content is cheapest on its own properties and it can mine our data from everywhere else (across our browsing history, devices and lives) to optimize those ads shifting w=

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. Meanwhile, Google is sending press and analysts chasing the bouncing ball with its YouTube disclosure. I wouldn't overlook the message from Facebook CFO, Google's clear risks in its 10K around data protection laws and how they're intersecting with antitrust. Gonna be messy.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. IMHO Google, by failing to address headwinds from data protection laws, is basically saying no one is making us change, we're not afraid of antitrust investigations by FTC, House Judiciary, Department of Justice, 48 state AGs, CMA, EU....

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. for the record, Sundar Pichai's answer regarding headwinds from changes to data regulations was terrible. One of his primary competitors lost 10% of its value over this and forecasted most impact ahead.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. if you're looking for context on Alphabet/Google finally disclosing revenues for YouTube, something I wrote 2yrs ago about how their org structure allowed them to dance thru SEC loophole. Analysts are kissing & hugging G for doing something years too late.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. their... a typo.... be nice. and yes this is a start due to org changes and regulator attention.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. Poništi
  11. Amazing. Sure would be nice if they had even a bit of disclosure considering they’re dominance in the the digital video ad market. Also would be good to know much is headed overseas especially to content farms.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 36%? Source? That’s significantly higher than anything I’ve seen inclusive of fact we’re talking desktop and US only.

    Poništi
  13. I'm old enough to remember when Google said they never used their homepage for commercial purposes. Nice propaganda, Google.

    Poništi
  14. Poništi
  15. 👏🏼 For those in need of optimism, this is an outstanding development to see GOP Sec of State speaking out in a nonpartisan manner. Iowa should be proud. It takes courage particularly since POTUS regularly retweets Judicial Watch and Tom Fitton.

    Poništi
  16. Screenshot for those who..like me...are blocked by Gab since...you know...they embrace open dialogue and censorship proof communities and all. Especially those who intentionally spread toxic disinfo and hate.

    Poništi
  17. and lastly a reminder that "disinfo" is a better term for the issue which is the real harm in misinfo as it shows intentionally doing it. If it's paid advertising and you don't want fact check it then you must suspend microtargeting.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. It's a similar problem to political ads. It's near impossible to fact-check all ads (and a good argument they shouldn't) so the attack vector should become the microtargeting of political ads which is what allows political statements to avoid sunlight to disinfect. But FB won't..

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. Good report. I would say this differently than . It's not so much that the misinfo makes Facebook $. It's the structure which provides velocity & reach to misinfo is core to Facebook's entire business. Misinfo is impossible to police so the biz model becomes the vector.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Reliable Charlie Kirk getting the ball rolling with the "voter fraud" disinfo.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. In theory, any change and risk creates opportunity. If that’s all it is but then fine but my take is the piece way overlooks the downward pressure due to new privacy laws still creeping towards enforcement considering data is the core asset to Facebook’s ad business. Cheers.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·