Sometimes Buddhist Tantra can seem frustrating, annoying and incomprehensible. It’s not unusual for people to want Tantra to be something it isn’t, like an extension of what they’re already doing, on steroids or something.
In this context... Do you see a valuable distinction between the emptiness of form &/or the form of emptiness?
-
-
Stuff looks different when you’re already uninvolved, maybe? Whereas encountering uninvolvement is really annoying from a manipulative standpoint.
-
I think I'm tracking & that follows... just wondering if either of these entry points to emptiness is more foundational to tantra.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.