Jamison Foser

@jamisonfoser they changed it to clarify that he says he never met her, right?

@nycsouthpaw Not quite. Initially they said he says he never met her … AND that they had determined they never met.

@jamisonfoser @nycsouthpaw Yes, that's exactly what happened. The WaPo never meant to say it determined that as fact.

@AmyEGardner Thanks. As you might imagine, I think that’s a pretty huge error to have made.

@jamisonfoser Among the remarkable, rock-solid revelations in this story, I might stop short of "huge." We make mistakes and we fix them.

@AmyEGardner You don’t think the WP asserting that it had determined Jackie lied when it had not in fact determined that is a big deal?

@jamisonfoser Wld be bigger if we'd meant to assert - was an editing error. We corrected as soon as we discovered it, and admitted it next.

@mboorstein (Hope that didn’t come across as taking it out on you.)

@jamisonfoser No worries, but these comments about our correx policies are way off. We are required to post them immediately

@mboorstein I don’t know anything about your requirements. I just know that the clarification wasn’t there at first.

@jamisonfoser Digital corrections come to readers immediately, much faster than print ones. If we make an error we want to fix asap 3/3

@mboorstein Thanks for follow-up. Don’t think I said anything about your correx policies that was “off base,” but if I did, pls let me know.

@jamisonfoser @marynmck No it's still there ... Read sentence above. @TReesShapiro What's the reason there?

@leonardkl @marynmck @TReesShapiro No it isn’t. The Post claimed it had determined they never met. It deleted that claim.

@jamisonfoser @marynmck @TReesShapiro True it is deleted from the bottom but added to the sentence before it; unless I'm missing something.

@leonardkl @marynmck @TReesShapiro … claiming that you’ve determined they never met.

@jamisonfoser @marynmck Gotcha. OK @washingtonpost, @TReesShapiro Should issue editor's note/clarification.